[JPLA] Beyond Electoral Fortunes: The Consolidation of a Far-Right Alignment in Brazil

Source: Journal of Politics in Latin America  |  Published: 2026-10-01

Category: 정권·선거 변동  |  Keywords: bolsonaro, brazil, electoral, far-right, politics

지침에 따라 먼저 확인 드립니다: 현재 요청은 "작성" 지시이지만, 내용이 브라질 극우 정치 학술논문에 대한 분석 기사(IOCSS 연구소용)로, 목록에 명시된 스킬 범주(ODA 제안서·보고서, 발표자료, 회의·미팅 보고서, 통화·회의 기록 인용) 어디에도 해당하지 않습니다. 맞는 스킬이 없으므로 이를 밝히고 일반 학술 작성 방식으로 진행합니다.

The far-right's durability beyond a single electoral cycle has become one of the defining puzzles of contemporary Latin American politics, and Brazil offers perhaps the clearest test case in the region. A forthcoming article in the Journal of Politics in Latin America, "Beyond Electoral Fortunes: The Consolidation of a Far-Right Alignment in Brazil" (Volume 18, Issue 2, pp. 235–260, August 2026), addresses precisely this question by examining what happened to Jair Bolsonaro's political project after his defeat in the 2022 presidential election. The timing of the inquiry matters: Bolsonaro's loss to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was widely read at the time as a potential inflection point that might reverse Brazil's rightward drift, yet subsequent developments — from the movement's electoral resilience in state and municipal races to its continued grip on Congress — suggest that the 2022 result did not dissolve the coalition that produced it. For an institute like IOCSS, which tracks how civil society and political economy interact across the Global South, Brazil's experience is instructive precisely because it separates the fate of a single leader from the survival of the ideological infrastructure he helped build.

The article's central contribution, as its title signals, is to move analysis "beyond electoral fortunes" — that is, beyond the binary of whether Bolsonaro personally wins or loses office — toward the question of alignment consolidation: how a loosely assembled coalition of evangelical constituencies, agribusiness interests, security-sector sympathizers, and digitally mobilized grassroots networks converts a single candidacy into a durable political bloc. This framing is significant because much of the earlier scholarly and journalistic literature on Bolsonarismo treated the phenomenon as contingent on Bolsonaro's own charisma and incumbency advantages, implying that an electoral defeat would necessarily fragment the coalition. By instead tracing the movement's institutional and organizational persistence after 2022, the article positions Brazilian far-right politics within the broader comparative literature on populist alignments that outlive their founding figures, a pattern also documented in cases such as Trump-aligned Republicanism in the United States and Vox's entrenchment in Spanish regional politics.

Brazil's case also needs to be read against a decade of regional political volatility in which electoral outcomes have repeatedly failed to settle underlying ideological contests. Since the 2016 impeachment of Dilma Rousseff, Brazilian politics has cycled through the technocratic interim government of Michel Temer, the insurgent right-wing victory of Bolsonaro in 2018, and Lula's narrow return to the presidency in 2022 — a sequence in which no single election has produced lasting consensus on the country's institutional or economic direction. The January 8, 2023 invasion of the Praça dos Três Poderes in Brasília, in which Bolsonaro supporters stormed the Presidential Palace, Congress, and the Supreme Federal Tribunal, stands as the starkest evidence that the movement's mobilizational capacity did not evaporate with the vote count. The article's focus on consolidation rather than collapse helps explain why such an event was possible: a coalition organized around shared grievance and identity, rather than around a single election outcome, retains the capacity for collective action even after its standard-bearer leaves office.

For researchers and policymakers concerned with democratic governance and civil society resilience, the implications extend well beyond Brazil's borders. Institutions such as the Organization of American States and democracy-monitoring bodies that calibrate their engagement around electoral cycles — treating a transfer of power as evidence that democratic institutions have "held" — may need to recalibrate their assessments when the losing coalition retains organizational depth, media infrastructure, and legislative representation sufficient to contest the legitimacy of the outcome itself. Brazil's Liberal Party (Partido Liberal), which became Bolsonaro's electoral vehicle and emerged from the 2022 elections as the largest bloc in the Chamber of Deputies, exemplifies how a far-right alignment can translate presidential defeat into enduring legislative leverage, constraining the governing coalition's capacity to pursue its own agenda on issues ranging from environmental regulation to social policy. This matters directly for ODA-adjacent and development-oriented institutions working in Brazil and comparable middle-income democracies, since program continuity, regulatory predictability, and civil society space are all shaped by whether an opposition bloc behaves as a normal parliamentary minority or as a movement still contesting the fundamental legitimacy of the sitting government.

Looking forward, the article's framework invites comparative extension to other Latin American and Global South contexts where personalist right-wing movements face electoral setbacks — Argentina's post-Kirchnerist right, Peru's Fujimorismo, or Colombia's Uribismo all present analogous puzzles about whether ideological alignments outlast the leaders who founded them. Practitioners monitoring civic space and electoral integrity in the region would do well to treat the Brazilian case not as a resolved episode but as an ongoing test of institutional resilience, particularly as Brazil approaches its next presidential contest with Bolsonaro's own eligibility clouded by the Tribunal Superior Eleitoral's 2023 ruling barring him from office until 2030. Future research building on this article's approach might productively track how the movement's leadership succession unfolds — whether through a family successor, an allied governor, or a diffuse network of aligned legislators — since the mechanism of succession will determine whether "Beyond Electoral Fortunes" describes a durable realignment of Brazilian politics or merely an interregnum awaiting Bolsonaro's own return.

Read the original article →